OMAHA, NE —&nbsp;The Platte Institute is advancing its vision for a more competitive and efficient Nebraska by releasing three new resources aimed at educating on opportunities to modernize the state’s regulatory and occupational licensing systems. Together,
 these resources provide a roadmap for reducing red tape, improving economic opportunities, and empowering Nebraskans to take charge of their regulatory future.&nbsp;

A Vision for a REINS Act in Nebraska Video

The Platte Institute’s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lffRuBOMbPY" target="_blank">new
 animated video</a> advocates for a state-level Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act. Similar to laws enacted in Florida, Kansas, and Wisconsin among others, this legislation would require
 legislative approval for high-cost regulations before they could take effect. By placing accountability and oversight at the forefront, the REINS Act would also introduce mechanisms to sunset outdated rules and cap regulatory growth, reducing unnecessary burdens
 on businesses, entrepreneurs, and families alike.&nbsp;

Regulatory Reform Progress and Opportunities

A new paper by Patrick A. McLaughlin, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center,&nbsp;“<a href="https://platteinstitute.org/regulatory-reform-in-nebraska-progress-challenges-and-opportunities/" target="_blank">Regulatory
 Reform in Nebraska: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities,</a>”&nbsp;highlights Nebraska’s notable achievements in cutting regulatory restrictions. Since 2017, the state has reduced regulations by 24.3%,
 positioning itself as a leader in red tape reduction. However, Dr. McLaughlin identifies additional steps Nebraska can take, such as adopting regulatory budgeting, establishing stronger sunset provisions, and implementing a REINS Act to further streamline
 the regulatory landscape.&nbsp;

Occupational Licensing Reform: Past Successes and Future Goals

Platte Institute Senior Fellow Laura Ebke, Ph.D., builds on Nebraska’s accomplishments in occupational licensing reform in her latest report,&nbsp;“<a href="https://platteinstitute.org/2023-2024-nebraska-occupational-licensing-review/" target="_blank">2023-2024
 Nebraska Occupational Licensing Review.</a>”&nbsp;The paper examines the impact of the 2018 Occupational Board Reform Act (OBRA) and subsequent reforms, including universal recognition of licenses and fair
 chance licensing for individuals with criminal records. Dr. Ebke also identifies future opportunities, such as strengthening sunrise reviews for proposed licenses and expanding public membership on licensing boards to enhance transparency and accountability.&nbsp;


&nbsp;“These three resources work together to show what’s possible for Nebraska,” said Platte Institute CEO Jim Vokal. “By tackling outdated regulations, improving oversight, and advancing occupational licensing reform, Nebraska can lead the nation in creating a
 regulatory environment that fosters growth, reduces costs, and puts individual—not bureaucracy—in charge.”&nbsp;


The Platte Institute envisions a regulatory framework where unnecessary rules no longer stand in the way of progress and where new regulations undergo rigorous scrutiny to ensure they serve Nebraskans' best interests. By embracing these reforms, Nebraska can
 unlock its full economic potential, making the state more competitive and resilient for future generations.&nbsp;
The new video and papers are available now at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.platteinstitute.org/" target="_blank">PlatteInstitute.org</a>.&nbsp;

Contact Ryan Kopsa at (402) 366-4432 or via email at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:rkopsa@platteinstitute.org" target="_blank">rkopsa@platteinstitute.org</a>to
 schedule an interview or learn more about these initiatives.&nbsp;
The Platte Institute works to advance policies that remove barriers to growth and opportunity in Nebraska. Learn more at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.platteinstitute.org/" target="_blank">PlatteInstitute.org</a>.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Platte InstituteOMAHA, NE —&nbsp;The Platte Institute is advancing its vision for a more competitive and efficient Nebraska by releasing three new resources aimed at educating on opportunities to modernize the state’s regulatory and occupational licensing systems. Together,
 these resources provide a roadmap for reducing red tape, improving economic opportunities, and empowering Nebraskans to take charge of their regulatory future.&nbsp;
A Vision for a REINS Act in Nebraska Video
The Platte Institute’s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lffRuBOMbPY" target="_blank">new
 animated video</a> advocates for a state-level Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act. Similar to laws enacted in Florida, Kansas, and Wisconsin among others, this legislation would require
 legislative approval for high-cost regulations before they could take effect. By placing accountability and oversight at the forefront, the REINS Act would also introduce mechanisms to sunset outdated rules and cap regulatory growth, reducing unnecessary burdens
 on businesses, entrepreneurs, and families alike.&nbsp;
Regulatory Reform Progress and Opportunities
A new paper by Patrick A. McLaughlin, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center,&nbsp;“<a href="https://platteinstitute.org/regulatory-reform-in-nebraska-progress-challenges-and-opportunities/" target="_blank">Regulatory
 Reform in Nebraska: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities,</a>”&nbsp;highlights Nebraska’s notable achievements in cutting regulatory restrictions. Since 2017, the state has reduced regulations by 24.3%,
 positioning itself as a leader in red tape reduction. However, Dr. McLaughlin identifies additional steps Nebraska can take, such as adopting regulatory budgeting, establishing stronger sunset provisions, and implementing a REINS Act to further streamline
 the regulatory landscape.&nbsp;
Occupational Licensing Reform: Past Successes and Future Goals
Platte Institute Senior Fellow Laura Ebke, Ph.D., builds on Nebraska’s accomplishments in occupational licensing reform in her latest report,&nbsp;“<a href="https://platteinstitute.org/2023-2024-nebraska-occupational-licensing-review/" target="_blank">2023-2024
 Nebraska Occupational Licensing Review.</a>”&nbsp;The paper examines the impact of the 2018 Occupational Board Reform Act (OBRA) and subsequent reforms, including universal recognition of licenses and fair
 chance licensing for individuals with criminal records. Dr. Ebke also identifies future opportunities, such as strengthening sunrise reviews for proposed licenses and expanding public membership on licensing boards to enhance transparency and accountability.&nbsp;
&nbsp;“These three resources work together to show what’s possible for Nebraska,” said Platte Institute CEO Jim Vokal. “By tackling outdated regulations, improving oversight, and advancing occupational licensing reform, Nebraska can lead the nation in creating a
 regulatory environment that fosters growth, reduces costs, and puts individual—not bureaucracy—in charge.”&nbsp;
The Platte Institute envisions a regulatory framework where unnecessary rules no longer stand in the way of progress and where new regulations undergo rigorous scrutiny to ensure they serve Nebraskans' best interests. By embracing these reforms, Nebraska can
 unlock its full economic potential, making the state more competitive and resilient for future generations.&nbsp;
The new video and papers are available now at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.platteinstitute.org/" target="_blank">PlatteInstitute.org</a>.&nbsp;
Contact Ryan Kopsa at (402) 366-4432 or via email at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:rkopsa@platteinstitute.org" target="_blank">rkopsa@platteinstitute.org</a>to
 schedule an interview or learn more about these initiatives.&nbsp;
The Platte Institute works to advance policies that remove barriers to growth and opportunity in Nebraska. Learn more at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.platteinstitute.org/" target="_blank">PlatteInstitute.org</a>.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Platte Institute Unveils New Resources to Modernize Nebraska’s Regulatory Framework 

WASHINGTON —As part of the surge in security assistance that President Biden announced on September 26 to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position, the Department of Defense (DoD) Monday announced additional security assistance to meet Ukraine's critical security and defense needs, according to a statement from the Department of Defense.

This announcement is the Biden Administration's seventy-first tranche of equipment to be provided from DoD inventories for Ukraine since August 2021. &nbsp;

This Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) package, which has an estimated value of $725 million, will provide Ukraine additional capabilities to meet its most urgent needs, including: air defense capabilities; munitions for rocket systems and artillery; and anti-tank weapons.

The capabilities in this announcement include:

The United States will continue to work together with some 50 Allies and partners through the Ukraine Defense Contact Group and its associated Capability Coalitions to meet Ukraine's urgently needed battlefield requirements and defend against Russian aggression.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/11/1732047530088.png" alt="Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy-courtesy image" />
 <figcaption>Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy-courtesy image</figcaption>
 </figure>WASHINGTON —As part of the surge in security assistance that President Biden announced on September 26 to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position, the Department of Defense (DoD) Monday announced additional security assistance to meet Ukraine's critical security and defense needs, according to a statement from the Department of Defense.This announcement is the Biden Administration's seventy-first tranche of equipment to be provided from DoD inventories for Ukraine since August 2021. &nbsp;This Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) package, which has an estimated value of $725 million, will provide Ukraine additional capabilities to meet its most urgent needs, including: air defense capabilities; munitions for rocket systems and artillery; and anti-tank weapons.The capabilities in this announcement include:<ul>
 <li>Munitions for National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS);</li><li>Stinger missiles;</li><li>Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (c-UAS) munitions;</li><li>Ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS);</li><li>155mm and 105mm artillery ammunition;</li><li>Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS);</li><li>Non-persistent land mines;</li><li>Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided (TOW) missiles;</li><li>Javelin and AT-4 anti-armor systems;</li><li>Small arms and ammunition;</li><li>Demolitions equipment and munitions;</li><li>Equipment to protect critical national infrastructure; and</li><li>Spare parts, ancillary equipment, services, training, and transportation.</li>
 </ul>The United States will continue to work together with some 50 Allies and partners through the Ukraine Defense Contact Group and its associated Capability Coalitions to meet Ukraine's urgently needed battlefield requirements and defend against Russian aggression.

U.S. will send Ukraine another $725 million in military assistance

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/29/sentencing-reform-task-force-recommends-deep-dive-into-improving-success-of-inmates-after-release/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — A task force seeking a “Nebraska way” to reduce prison overcrowding and avoid repeat crimes by inmates is calling for a “deeper dive” into ways to improve post-release supervision and reduce the number of inmates serving short sentences.

The Nebraska Sentencing Reform Task Force, which was formed by a 2023 criminal justice law, issued its annual report in November, calling for more study of possible reforms with the intention of introducing proposals during the 2026 legislative session.

Members of the task force expressed differing views on whether meaningful reforms will ever be adopted.

State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha, who is term-limited, said that while task force members have been working together, “now it comes down to the politics, I don’t know if we’ll have strong enough willpower to get something done.”

Wayne, the chairman of the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee, has long argued that doing nothing will mean the state will need to build not one but two $350 million-plus prisons to handle the anticipated increase in inmates by 2030.

A&nbsp;Facility Master Plan for the Nebraska Department of Corrections, released in 2023, stated that Nebraska would still have 1,300 more inmates than its prisons were designed to hold after a new, 1,500-bed facility is completed north of Lincoln.&nbsp;

A second new prison would be needed by 2030, said Dewberry, the consultant who produced the master plan.

Meanwhile, a report earlier this year by the Center for Justice Research at the University of Nebraska at Omaha said the state could avoid building a second new prison if “short-timers” sat out their sentences in county jails or were sentenced to other alternatives rather than going to prison.

In February, the Nebraska Department of Corrections joined a national effort called Reentry 2030 with an aim to reduce the state’s recidivism rate from 28% to 18% by 2030. Goals include increasing participation in educational and rehabilitation programs and ensuring job placement once inmates finish their sentence or are paroled.

Another task force member, Douglas County Sheriff Aaron Hanson, said he’s optimistic that effective reforms can be adopted.

He said he would support looking at how Texas handles inmates with short sentences, in state-run “county jails,” and said providing inmates with marketable job skills is key.

“We’re never going to break that cycle of crime unless we give inmates the skills so they can live a life of dignity,” Hanson said.&nbsp;

“Everybody realizes that what we need are more options, both on the front end (probation and diversion) and the back end (parole and post-release supervision),” he said.

Omaha Sen. Terrell McKinney, who co-chairs the task force with Attorney General Mike Hilgers, said he shares Wayne’s concerns but remains hopeful, despite recent setbacks for sentencing reform proposals.

“It’s the only way I can stay sane,” McKinney said of his optimism. “The data (for sentencing reform) has been there, but people didn’t trust it.”

To be sure, Nebraska’s history with sentencing reform has been rocky.&nbsp;

Two nationally recognized authorities on reducing prison overcrowding, the Justice Center of the Council of State Governments and the&nbsp;nonprofit Crime and Justice Institute,&nbsp;have conducted lengthy studies in recent years, leading to recommended changes in sentences to cut costs and prison crowding.&nbsp;

But many of the recommendations were ultimately rejected by state lawmakers as “soft on crime.”

That has led reform advocates such as McKinney and Wayne to state that without changes, Nebraska will be forced to build another expensive new prison like the 1,500-bed facility now rising just north of Lincoln.&nbsp;

As of this summer, state prisons held about 1,800 more inmates than they were designed to house, and Nebraska continues to have one of the most overcrowded prison systems in the nation.&nbsp;

The latest rejected recommendations, in 2023, led to amending a proposal, Legislative Bill 50, to create the sentencing reform task force. It was charged with devising a “Nebraska way” to reduce prison populations and improve outcomes for inmates released back into society.

The task force took testimony in recent months from state corrections, parole and probation officials, as well as corrections staff, former inmates and victims of crime.

Improving reentry success is important because more than 90% of all prison inmates will leave prisons eventually.&nbsp;

Within three years, more than 28% of inmates released will commit new crimes, returning them behind bars, according to the latest state data. This “recidivism rate” has declined from a high of 31% in 2017.

The task force report stated that treating inmates’ mental illnesses remains a huge challenge. The report said approximately 1,709 inmates in Nebraska state prisons — or about 29% of all inmates — have a serious mental health illness, ranging from major depressive disorder and schizophrenia to bipolar disorder.&nbsp;

Improving care, the report said, could help reduce recidivism.&nbsp;

The 16-page task force report recommended a “deep dive” into two areas specifically:

The report recommended looking at alternatives to prison, such as ankle monitors and home confinement, or having people serving their time in county jails.

Hanson said it’s a balancing act: providing rehabilitation for those inmates who truly want to change their lives while protecting the public.

McKinney, who was recently re-elected to a second four-year term in his North Omaha district, said he plans to introduce bills in the 2025 session to “keep alive” a discussion of sentencing reforms.

The task force report stated that once more study is completed, the task force may have proposals to introduce in the 2026 legislative session.&nbsp;

Hanson said sentencing reform is complicated, “with a lot of moving parts,” so it takes time to develop proposals.&nbsp;

McKinney added that extra time may increase understanding of the issues.&nbsp;

“People want to take more time and get to a space where they can understand it,” he said, adding that many of his proposals are “an uphill climb.”

Wayne, who will leave office in January, said he’s not optimistic as he sees the Legislature taking a more “pro-prosecutor” stance.

Lincoln Sen. Carolyn Bosn, a former deputy county attorney, is seen as the probable new chair of the Judiciary Committee, which crafts criminal justice proposals. She would be the first prosecutor to hold that position in recent decades.&nbsp;

Past Judiciary Committee chairs have been defense attorneys, such as Sens. Steve Lathrop, Brad Ashford and Kermit Brashear.

Sen. Bosn did not return phone messages left by the Examiner on Tuesday and Wednesday.&nbsp;

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/12/1733173849024.jpeg" alt="The Nebraska State Penitentiary in Lincoln. (Rebecca S. Gratz for the Nebraska Examiner)" />
 <figcaption>The Nebraska State Penitentiary in Lincoln. (Rebecca S. Gratz for the Nebraska Examiner)</figcaption>
 </figure>Paul Hammel<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/29/sentencing-reform-task-force-recommends-deep-dive-into-improving-success-of-inmates-after-release/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — A task force seeking a “Nebraska way” to reduce prison overcrowding and avoid repeat crimes by inmates is calling for a “deeper dive” into ways to improve post-release supervision and reduce the number of inmates serving short sentences.The Nebraska Sentencing Reform Task Force, which was formed by a 2023 criminal justice law, issued its annual report in November, calling for more study of possible reforms with the intention of introducing proposals during the 2026 legislative session.Members of the task force expressed differing views on whether meaningful reforms will ever be adopted.State Sen. Justin Wayne of Omaha, who is term-limited, said that while task force members have been working together, “now it comes down to the politics, I don’t know if we’ll have strong enough willpower to get something done.”Wayne, the chairman of the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee, has long argued that doing nothing will mean the state will need to build not one but two $350 million-plus prisons to handle the anticipated increase in inmates by 2030.<h2>Facility master plan</h2>A&nbsp;Facility Master Plan for the Nebraska Department of Corrections, released in 2023, stated that Nebraska would still have 1,300 more inmates than its prisons were designed to hold after a new, 1,500-bed facility is completed north of Lincoln.&nbsp;A second new prison would be needed by 2030, said Dewberry, the consultant who produced the master plan.Meanwhile, a report earlier this year by the Center for Justice Research at the University of Nebraska at Omaha said the state could avoid building a second new prison if “short-timers” sat out their sentences in county jails or were sentenced to other alternatives rather than going to prison.In February, the Nebraska Department of Corrections joined a national effort called Reentry 2030 with an aim to reduce the state’s recidivism rate from 28% to 18% by 2030. Goals include increasing participation in educational and rehabilitation programs and ensuring job placement once inmates finish their sentence or are paroled.Another task force member, Douglas County Sheriff Aaron Hanson, said he’s optimistic that effective reforms can be adopted.He said he would support looking at how Texas handles inmates with short sentences, in state-run “county jails,” and said providing inmates with marketable job skills is key.“We’re never going to break that cycle of crime unless we give inmates the skills so they can live a life of dignity,” Hanson said.&nbsp;“Everybody realizes that what we need are more options, both on the front end (probation and diversion) and the back end (parole and post-release supervision),” he said.<h2>Rocky history with reform</h2>Omaha Sen. Terrell McKinney, who co-chairs the task force with Attorney General Mike Hilgers, said he shares Wayne’s concerns but remains hopeful, despite recent setbacks for sentencing reform proposals.“It’s the only way I can stay sane,” McKinney said of his optimism. “The data (for sentencing reform) has been there, but people didn’t trust it.”To be sure, Nebraska’s history with sentencing reform has been rocky.&nbsp;Two nationally recognized authorities on reducing prison overcrowding, the Justice Center of the Council of State Governments and the&nbsp;nonprofit Crime and Justice Institute,&nbsp;have conducted lengthy studies in recent years, leading to recommended changes in sentences to cut costs and prison crowding.&nbsp;But many of the recommendations were ultimately rejected by state lawmakers as “soft on crime.”That has led reform advocates such as McKinney and Wayne to state that without changes, Nebraska will be forced to build another expensive new prison like the 1,500-bed facility now rising just north of Lincoln.&nbsp;As of this summer, state prisons held about 1,800 more inmates than they were designed to house, and Nebraska continues to have one of the most overcrowded prison systems in the nation.&nbsp;The latest rejected recommendations, in 2023, led to amending a proposal, Legislative Bill 50, to create the sentencing reform task force. It was charged with devising a “Nebraska way” to reduce prison populations and improve outcomes for inmates released back into society.The task force took testimony in recent months from state corrections, parole and probation officials, as well as corrections staff, former inmates and victims of crime.<h2>Over 90% will leave prison</h2>Improving reentry success is important because more than 90% of all prison inmates will leave prisons eventually.&nbsp;Within three years, more than 28% of inmates released will commit new crimes, returning them behind bars, according to the latest state data. This “recidivism rate” has declined from a high of 31% in 2017.The task force report stated that treating inmates’ mental illnesses remains a huge challenge. The report said approximately 1,709 inmates in Nebraska state prisons — or about 29% of all inmates — have a serious mental health illness, ranging from major depressive disorder and schizophrenia to bipolar disorder.&nbsp;Improving care, the report said, could help reduce recidivism.&nbsp;The 16-page task force report recommended a “deep dive” into two areas specifically:<ul>
 <li>How to improve success of post-release supervision, such as parole, by providing better quality jobs and housing for departing inmates, as well as preparing them for simple tasks like paying bills and handling leases.</li><li>How to better handle “short-timers,” or inmates serving less than one year in state prison. “This population puts a significant burden” on one of the state’s most overcrowded facilities, the Reception and Treatment Center in Lincoln, where short-sentence inmates are held. The RTC, according to the most recent statistics, was holding about 1,477 inmates a night, far beyond its design capacity of 884.&nbsp;</li>
 </ul>The report recommended looking at alternatives to prison, such as ankle monitors and home confinement, or having people serving their time in county jails.Hanson said it’s a balancing act: providing rehabilitation for those inmates who truly want to change their lives while protecting the public.<h2>‘A lot of moving parts’</h2>McKinney, who was recently re-elected to a second four-year term in his North Omaha district, said he plans to introduce bills in the 2025 session to “keep alive” a discussion of sentencing reforms.The task force report stated that once more study is completed, the task force may have proposals to introduce in the 2026 legislative session.&nbsp;Hanson said sentencing reform is complicated, “with a lot of moving parts,” so it takes time to develop proposals.&nbsp;McKinney added that extra time may increase understanding of the issues.&nbsp;“People want to take more time and get to a space where they can understand it,” he said, adding that many of his proposals are “an uphill climb.”Wayne, who will leave office in January, said he’s not optimistic as he sees the Legislature taking a more “pro-prosecutor” stance.Lincoln Sen. Carolyn Bosn, a former deputy county attorney, is seen as the probable new chair of the Judiciary Committee, which crafts criminal justice proposals. She would be the first prosecutor to hold that position in recent decades.&nbsp;Past Judiciary Committee chairs have been defense attorneys, such as Sens. Steve Lathrop, Brad Ashford and Kermit Brashear.Sen. Bosn did not return phone messages left by the Examiner on Tuesday and Wednesday.&nbsp;

Sentencing Reform Task Force wants to Improve Success of Released Inmates

December 2, 2024 (Lincoln, Neb.)&nbsp;&nbsp;— The Nebraska State Patrol is pleased to announce the promotion of Major Jeff Roby to the position of Assistant Superintendent and the rank of Lt. Colonel. Roby replaces Lt. Colonel Buck Duis, who retired at the end of November.

Roby, a native of Grand Island, is a 28-year veteran of the Nebraska State Patrol. He has most recently served as the Western Operations Major, which includes Patrol Division operations in Troop Areas C, D, and E, as well as the NSP Training Academy and Crash Reconstruction Team. He has also served in the Patrol Division, Carrier Enforcement, SWAT, and Training Academy.

“Major Roby’s experience and knowledge will be incredible assets in this critical position within the patrol,” said Colonel John Bolduc, Superintendent of the Nebraska State Patrol. “His career of leadership in numerous areas of NSP operations will be a great benefit to the troopers, investigators, and professional staff serving across Nebraska. I’d also like to thank Lt. Colonel Duis for his career of dedication, helping to maintain public safety in every corner of our state.”

Duis’s retirement completes a decorated, 35-year career serving the people of Nebraska. The last six years have been spent as NSP’s Assistant Superintendent, with previous service in the NSP Training Academy, SWAT Team, Police Service Dog Unit, Patrol Division, and Investigative Services Division.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/12/1733171237055.jpeg" alt="Major Jeff Roby (Courtesy of NSP)" />
 <figcaption>Major Jeff Roby (Courtesy of NSP)</figcaption>
 </figure>Cody ThomasNebraska State PatrolDecember 2, 2024 (Lincoln, Neb.)&nbsp;&nbsp;— The Nebraska State Patrol is pleased to announce the promotion of Major Jeff Roby to the position of Assistant Superintendent and the rank of Lt. Colonel. Roby replaces Lt. Colonel Buck Duis, who retired at the end of November.Roby, a native of Grand Island, is a 28-year veteran of the Nebraska State Patrol. He has most recently served as the Western Operations Major, which includes Patrol Division operations in Troop Areas C, D, and E, as well as the NSP Training Academy and Crash Reconstruction Team. He has also served in the Patrol Division, Carrier Enforcement, SWAT, and Training Academy.“Major Roby’s experience and knowledge will be incredible assets in this critical position within the patrol,” said Colonel John Bolduc, Superintendent of the Nebraska State Patrol. “His career of leadership in numerous areas of NSP operations will be a great benefit to the troopers, investigators, and professional staff serving across Nebraska. I’d also like to thank Lt. Colonel Duis for his career of dedication, helping to maintain public safety in every corner of our state.”Duis’s retirement completes a decorated, 35-year career serving the people of Nebraska. The last six years have been spent as NSP’s Assistant Superintendent, with previous service in the NSP Training Academy, SWAT Team, Police Service Dog Unit, Patrol Division, and Investigative Services Division.

Major Jeff Roby Promoted to Lt. Colonel

<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/02/fewer-voters-turned-away-under-new-nebraska-voter-id-law-than-in-similar-states/">Nebraska Examiner</a>

LINCOLN — The ballots of 345 people weren’t counted in Nebraska’s first presidential general election under a new requirement that voters present a picture ID to participate.

That’s out of more than 965,000 ballots cast statewide, which represents less than four hundredths of one percentage point. Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen has said voter ID implementation went “extremely well.”

“It went very well,” Evnen told the Examiner. “That was a result of the hard work of our county election officials and our elections division. Nebraska is the gold standard in terms of the way we conduct our elections.”

For comparison’s sake, election officials rejected more than 650 early voting ballots statewide because voters failed to sign the envelope. Those signatures are verified against the voter file as an additional identification check.

Local election observers, including some who oppose requiring ID, praised the state’s efforts to educate the public about the new law, work with counties to train local poll workers and respond to problems.&nbsp;

Nebraska this year joined 37 other states now requiring voter ID, according to data compiled by VoteRiders, a national nonprofit group that helps people meet voter ID requirements. Voters passed a state constitutional amendment in 2022 requiring the Legislature to implement voter ID in Nebraska.

Voting rights advocates said it is hard to know how many people chose not to vote because they lacked ID or because they faced pushback at the polls or at county election offices and didn’t complain publicly.

2024 Nebraska voter ID general election, by the numbers

272: provisional ballots cast in person at polling sites without ID

211: rejected for lack of ID provided at county election office by deadline after election

107: ballots returned without ID number on envelope or photocopy of ID or impediment form

76: forms filed seeking exception for reasonable impediment

27: rejected for lack of meeting allowed exceptions

345: total number of ballots rejected&nbsp;

A handful of Nebraskans raised concerns about this year’s voting. One example: A Columbus woman filed a formal complaint with the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission about her interactions with a Platte County poll worker.&nbsp;

The woman asked ACLU Nebraska not to share her name publicly, saying she feared for her safety. She went to vote at her Columbus polling place over her lunch break on Election Day, Nov. 5, according to her complaint.&nbsp;

Her driver’s license had expired a month earlier, but that is still an acceptable form of ID under Nebraska’s law, ACLU lawyer Joy Kathurima said. The woman also provided her active U.S. passport as a backup, another valid form of ID.

A Platte County poll worker unfamiliar with the federal citizenship requirements for a U.S. passport, questioned whether the woman, an American of Latino heritage, could prove she was a U.S. citizen.&nbsp;

Eventually, the woman was allowed to vote because another Platte County poll worker corrected the first poll worker and pointed out that passports count as valid voter ID.

The woman told the ACLU, which filed the complaint on her behalf, that she felt “incredibly uncomfortable” at her polling place. She was already an infrequent voter, having not voted in eight years, Kathurima said, so this didn’t help.

“To have that type of experience obviously makes it even harder for someone to be able to want to vote in the future,” Kathurima said.&nbsp;

The Platte County Election Commission did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. State election officials acknowledged a handful of incidents in which poll workers misunderstood the requirements.

Groups such as ACLU Nebraska and Civic Nebraska say having even one voter turned away is too many. They pointed to close races like east Omaha’s Legislative District 13 as an example where every vote matters.

In that race, 151 votes separated Ashlei Spivey, the winner, from second-place finisher Nick Batter. Election officials, however, have said they knew of no result that would have flipped because of voter ID issues.

The most common concern reported to Civic Nebraska’s voter hotline was poll workers not understanding that the picture ID is required only to verify that voters are who they say they are —&nbsp;not to verify their address.

Some poll workers told voters erroneously that the addresses on their driver’s license or state ID needed to match the voter rolls, which is not required, said Heidi Uhing, Civic’s director of public policy.

“You are who you are regardless of where you’re located,” Uhing said. “The benefit of that part of the law is that people move around a lot, and not everyone is speedy about getting their documentation updated.”

The most ballots cast without IDs occurred in Douglas County. There, 146 people who didn’t have ID or lacked a valid ID voted provisionally. Of those 146, 48 were able to fix the problem, officials said. Twenty-three of them visited the election office later and showed acceptable ID, and 25 verified a reasonable impediment.

That means 98 others turned in provisional ballots but did not have their votes counted, including some who filed for impediments but did not meet the standard and did not return verification calls from election officials, Douglas County Election Commissioner Brian Kruse said.

Kruse mentioned a would-be voter who had moved to the Omaha area from Chicago but couldn’t get Cook County, Illinois, to send her a copy of her birth certificate in time to get a Nebraska-approved ID.

Nebraska requires in-person voters to take a state-approved photo ID, which could include a driver’s license, a college ID, a nursing home ID, a passport, a military ID, a tribal ID or an ID from a city, county, school district or another political subdivision.

People who forget to take their photo ID but want to cast their ballot can still choose to vote provisionally. However, they will need to take a photo ID to their county election office within a week of Election Day.

People who lack a photo ID can have their ballots counted if they apply for a certificate from their county election office verifying an accepted disability, circumstance or religious objection.&nbsp;

Voters requesting a ballot to vote early by mail must also verify their ID. They can do so by writing down their ID number from a Nebraska driver’s license or state ID card.&nbsp;

Those unwilling or unable to provide one of those ID numbers on the request form can instead enclose a photocopy of a state-approved photo ID, which could be a passport, military ID or Nebraska college ID, among others. People with disabilities, a major illness or religious objections to being photographed can fill out an exception form.

His office saw some voters who moved from Iowa and didn’t know that the Nebraska law only recognizes driver’s licenses from the Cornhusker State. He also heard some confusion about how to verify IDs from nursing homes.&nbsp;

“Honestly it went very, very smooth,” Kruse said. “I was a little worried since this was our first big election. … I guess the good news is honestly it didn’t affect turnout, which was among the biggest we’ve had.”

Statewide turnout was the second-highest in votes cast, with 965,236. Douglas saw 75% turnout. Some counties in rural Nebraska saw turnout of over 80% of registered voters, including Arthur, Hooker and Thomas Counties in the Sandhills.&nbsp;

Only the pandemic-fueled 2020 election had more votes cast, at 966,920. And only the 1968 presidential election had a higher percentage turnout – 81% of registered voters. This year’s statewide turnout was 76%.

Kathurima said Nebraskans won’t know how many people might have voted because “any voter restriction … will always have a chilling effect.”&nbsp;

In other states with voter ID, restrictions have disproportionately reduced voting by people in poverty, the elderly and the infirm. Much depends on the strictness of IDs required.

Voter ID advocates have argued that the requirements help reduce election fraud by making it more difficult to impersonate another voter. Many are particularly interested in requiring ID to vote by mail.

The push drew more attention after the 2020 election, when then-President Donald Trump criticized voting by mail after his loss to President Joe Biden and questioned the verification processes.

Kathurima and Uhing said they would like to see the state tweak the training help offered to poll workers to emphasize which IDs are acceptable. Signs clarifying what IDs are accepted could also be more prominent at polling places, they suggested.

Evnen said his office would take that feedback from stakeholders and work with local election officials to see what they can learn from it and improve.

Several advocates acknowledged the work Nebraska election officials have done educating voters, including tapping into $1.5 million in funding for outreach. They also credited Nebraska for passing a more flexible version of voter ID than some states.

But some said it should matter to Nebraskans that a number of “votes did not count in this election,” as Uhing said.

“If they didn’t come back to resolve that, that’s a real shame,” she said. “We have to go back … and understand how people might be moved to go back (and fix their ballots).”

Aaron Sanderford<a href="https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/12/02/fewer-voters-turned-away-under-new-nebraska-voter-id-law-than-in-similar-states/">Nebraska Examiner</a>LINCOLN — The ballots of 345 people weren’t counted in Nebraska’s first presidential general election under a new requirement that voters present a picture ID to participate.That’s out of more than 965,000 ballots cast statewide, which represents less than four hundredths of one percentage point. Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen has said voter ID implementation went “extremely well.”“It went very well,” Evnen told the Examiner. “That was a result of the hard work of our county election officials and our elections division. Nebraska is the gold standard in terms of the way we conduct our elections.”For comparison’s sake, election officials rejected more than 650 early voting ballots statewide because voters failed to sign the envelope. Those signatures are verified against the voter file as an additional identification check.Local election observers, including some who oppose requiring ID, praised the state’s efforts to educate the public about the new law, work with counties to train local poll workers and respond to problems.&nbsp;Nebraska this year joined 37 other states now requiring voter ID, according to data compiled by VoteRiders, a national nonprofit group that helps people meet voter ID requirements. Voters passed a state constitutional amendment in 2022 requiring the Legislature to implement voter ID in Nebraska.Voting rights advocates said it is hard to know how many people chose not to vote because they lacked ID or because they faced pushback at the polls or at county election offices and didn’t complain publicly.<h2>2024 Nebraska voter ID general election, by the numbers</h2>In-person voting272: provisional ballots cast in person at polling sites without ID211: rejected for lack of ID provided at county election office by deadline after election61: in-person ballots corrected or curedVoting by mail in all-mail counties107: ballots returned without ID number on envelope or photocopy of ID or impediment formReasonable impediments76: forms filed seeking exception for reasonable impediment27: rejected for lack of meeting allowed exceptionsTotal rejected345: total number of ballots rejected&nbsp;<h2>Some raised concerns</h2>A handful of Nebraskans raised concerns about this year’s voting. One example: A Columbus woman filed a formal complaint with the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission about her interactions with a Platte County poll worker.&nbsp;The woman asked ACLU Nebraska not to share her name publicly, saying she feared for her safety. She went to vote at her Columbus polling place over her lunch break on Election Day, Nov. 5, according to her complaint.&nbsp;Her driver’s license had expired a month earlier, but that is still an acceptable form of ID under Nebraska’s law, ACLU lawyer Joy Kathurima said. The woman also provided her active U.S. passport as a backup, another valid form of ID.A Platte County poll worker unfamiliar with the federal citizenship requirements for a U.S. passport, questioned whether the woman, an American of Latino heritage, could prove she was a U.S. citizen.&nbsp;Eventually, the woman was allowed to vote because another Platte County poll worker corrected the first poll worker and pointed out that passports count as valid voter ID.The woman told the ACLU, which filed the complaint on her behalf, that she felt “incredibly uncomfortable” at her polling place. She was already an infrequent voter, having not voted in eight years, Kathurima said, so this didn’t help.“To have that type of experience obviously makes it even harder for someone to be able to want to vote in the future,” Kathurima said.&nbsp;The Platte County Election Commission did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. State election officials acknowledged a handful of incidents in which poll workers misunderstood the requirements.<h2>No results changed, officials say</h2>Groups such as ACLU Nebraska and Civic Nebraska say having even one voter turned away is too many. They pointed to close races like east Omaha’s Legislative District 13 as an example where every vote matters.In that race, 151 votes separated Ashlei Spivey, the winner, from second-place finisher Nick Batter. Election officials, however, have said they knew of no result that would have flipped because of voter ID issues.The most common concern reported to Civic Nebraska’s voter hotline was poll workers not understanding that the picture ID is required only to verify that voters are who they say they are —&nbsp;not to verify their address.Some poll workers told voters erroneously that the addresses on their driver’s license or state ID needed to match the voter rolls, which is not required, said Heidi Uhing, Civic’s director of public policy.“You are who you are regardless of where you’re located,” Uhing said. “The benefit of that part of the law is that people move around a lot, and not everyone is speedy about getting their documentation updated.”The most ballots cast without IDs occurred in Douglas County. There, 146 people who didn’t have ID or lacked a valid ID voted provisionally. Of those 146, 48 were able to fix the problem, officials said. Twenty-three of them visited the election office later and showed acceptable ID, and 25 verified a reasonable impediment.That means 98 others turned in provisional ballots but did not have their votes counted, including some who filed for impediments but did not meet the standard and did not return verification calls from election officials, Douglas County Election Commissioner Brian Kruse said.Kruse mentioned a would-be voter who had moved to the Omaha area from Chicago but couldn’t get Cook County, Illinois, to send her a copy of her birth certificate in time to get a Nebraska-approved ID.<h2>How voter ID works in Nebraska</h2>Voting in personNebraska requires in-person voters to take a state-approved photo ID, which could include a driver’s license, a college ID, a nursing home ID, a passport, a military ID, a tribal ID or an ID from a city, county, school district or another political subdivision.People who forget to take their photo ID but want to cast their ballot can still choose to vote provisionally. However, they will need to take a photo ID to their county election office within a week of Election Day.People who lack a photo ID can have their ballots counted if they apply for a certificate from their county election office verifying an accepted disability, circumstance or religious objection.&nbsp;Voting by mailVoters requesting a ballot to vote early by mail must also verify their ID. They can do so by writing down their ID number from a Nebraska driver’s license or state ID card.&nbsp;Those unwilling or unable to provide one of those ID numbers on the request form can instead enclose a photocopy of a state-approved photo ID, which could be a passport, military ID or Nebraska college ID, among others. People with disabilities, a major illness or religious objections to being photographed can fill out an exception form.His office saw some voters who moved from Iowa and didn’t know that the Nebraska law only recognizes driver’s licenses from the Cornhusker State. He also heard some confusion about how to verify IDs from nursing homes.&nbsp;“Honestly it went very, very smooth,” Kruse said. “I was a little worried since this was our first big election. … I guess the good news is honestly it didn’t affect turnout, which was among the biggest we’ve had.”<h2>Turnout high</h2>Statewide turnout was the second-highest in votes cast, with 965,236. Douglas saw 75% turnout. Some counties in rural Nebraska saw turnout of over 80% of registered voters, including Arthur, Hooker and Thomas Counties in the Sandhills.&nbsp;Only the pandemic-fueled 2020 election had more votes cast, at 966,920. And only the 1968 presidential election had a higher percentage turnout – 81% of registered voters. This year’s statewide turnout was 76%.Kathurima said Nebraskans won’t know how many people might have voted because “any voter restriction … will always have a chilling effect.”&nbsp;In other states with voter ID, restrictions have disproportionately reduced voting by people in poverty, the elderly and the infirm. Much depends on the strictness of IDs required.Voter ID advocates have argued that the requirements help reduce election fraud by making it more difficult to impersonate another voter. Many are particularly interested in requiring ID to vote by mail.The push drew more attention after the 2020 election, when then-President Donald Trump criticized voting by mail after his loss to President Joe Biden and questioned the verification processes.Kathurima and Uhing said they would like to see the state tweak the training help offered to poll workers to emphasize which IDs are acceptable. Signs clarifying what IDs are accepted could also be more prominent at polling places, they suggested.Evnen said his office would take that feedback from stakeholders and work with local election officials to see what they can learn from it and improve.Several advocates acknowledged the work Nebraska election officials have done educating voters, including tapping into $1.5 million in funding for outreach. They also credited Nebraska for passing a more flexible version of voter ID than some states.But some said it should matter to Nebraskans that a number of “votes did not count in this election,” as Uhing said.“If they didn’t come back to resolve that, that’s a real shame,” she said. “We have to go back … and understand how people might be moved to go back (and fix their ballots).”

Fewer voters turned away under new Nebraska voter ID law than in similar states

Pleasanton, Neb. - The Buffalo County Sheriff's Office is investigating a single-vehicle crash that resulted in the death of an adult female driver. The crash&nbsp;was reported&nbsp;at approximately 5:52 AM on Friday, November 29, 2024.

According to the preliminary investigation, a 2005 Nissan Sentra was traveling eastbound on 340th Rd near Hawk Rd, north of Pleasanton, NE. &nbsp;The vehicle left the roadway and struck a utility pole.&nbsp; The driver of the&nbsp;vehicle, identified as Elizabeth Michelle Elder, 30, of Ravenna, Nebraska, was pronounced deceased at the scene.

Deputies were assisted at the scene by members&nbsp;of the Kearney/Buffalo County&nbsp;Fatality&nbsp;Accident Investigation Team (FAIT), Pleasanton Volunteer Fire Department, CHI Good Samaritan Hospital Paramedics, Air Care, Buffalo County Highway Department, and the Buffalo County Attorney's Office.

Next of kin have been notified. The investigation is ongoing.

Buffalo County Sheriff's OfficePleasanton, Neb. - The Buffalo County Sheriff's Office is investigating a single-vehicle crash that resulted in the death of an adult female driver. The crash&nbsp;was reported&nbsp;at approximately 5:52 AM on Friday, November 29, 2024.According to the preliminary investigation, a 2005 Nissan Sentra was traveling eastbound on 340th Rd near Hawk Rd, north of Pleasanton, NE. &nbsp;The vehicle left the roadway and struck a utility pole.&nbsp; The driver of the&nbsp;vehicle, identified as Elizabeth Michelle Elder, 30, of Ravenna, Nebraska, was pronounced deceased at the scene.Deputies were assisted at the scene by members&nbsp;of the Kearney/Buffalo County&nbsp;Fatality&nbsp;Accident Investigation Team (FAIT), Pleasanton Volunteer Fire Department, CHI Good Samaritan Hospital Paramedics, Air Care, Buffalo County Highway Department, and the Buffalo County Attorney's Office.Next of kin have been notified. The investigation is ongoing.

Investigation underway in a fatal crash in Central Nebraska

LINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen and First Lady Suzanne are inviting Nebraskans to two holiday events on Dec. 8. The first is the annual lighting of the State Christmas Tree. The second event, which will follow immediately after, is the Hometown Christmas at the Governor’s Residence. This year, it includes a salute to veteran and active military. Both events are free.

This is the 76th year for the tree lighting ceremony in the Capitol Rotunda. It starts at 1:30 p.m. and will feature prelude music by the Sharpshooters Woodwind group, part of the Nebraska National Guard 43rd Army Band. The program will be hosted by award-winning Nebraska broadcaster Charlie Brogan. Performers include choirs from Concordia Lutheran High School of Omaha and Wahoo Elementary School of Wahoo. Gov. Pillen will deliver his holiday message before leading the lighting of this year’s donated Christmas tree. The tree is scheduled to be transported to the Capitol early next week.

Following the ceremony, a Hometown Christmas will be celebrated outdoors at the Governor’s Residence, 1425 H Street, Lincoln. Open to the public, and in its second year, this holiday tradition will feature the Blackhawk Brass of the Nebraska National Guard 43rd Army Band, choir performers, Mr. &amp; Mrs. Claus, a live nativity scene, elf car rides, hayrack and horse drawn carriage rides, live animals, face painting, a balloon artist, hot cocoa, cookies and much more. The festivities will get underway at 2:30 p.m. and continue until 4:30 p.m. Streets around the Governor’s Residence will be closed to traffic during that time.  As all events will take place outside, attendees are encouraged to dress appropriately for the weather.

Throughout the holiday season, visitors are welcome to the State Capitol. Free guided tours are offered hourly Monday – Friday at the following times: 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 1:00 2:00, 3:00 and 4:00.  On Saturdays, tours begin at 10 a.m. and on Sundays at 1:00 p.m. The Capitol will be closed on Christmas Day (Dec. 25) and again on New Year’s Day (Jan. 1). Once lit, the tree will remain up through Sunday, Dec. 29.

Please call the Tour Office at (402) 471-0448 for more information about visiting the Capitol.

Office of Governor Jim PillenLINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen and First Lady Suzanne are inviting Nebraskans to two holiday events on Dec. 8. The first is the annual lighting of the State Christmas Tree. The second event, which will follow immediately after, is the Hometown Christmas at the Governor’s Residence. This year, it includes a salute to veteran and active military. Both events are free.This is the 76th year for the tree lighting ceremony in the Capitol Rotunda. It starts at 1:30 p.m. and will feature prelude music by the Sharpshooters Woodwind group, part of the Nebraska National Guard 43rd Army Band. The program will be hosted by award-winning Nebraska broadcaster Charlie Brogan. Performers include choirs from Concordia Lutheran High School of Omaha and Wahoo Elementary School of Wahoo. Gov. Pillen will deliver his holiday message before leading the lighting of this year’s donated Christmas tree. The tree is scheduled to be transported to the Capitol early next week.Following the ceremony, a Hometown Christmas will be celebrated outdoors at the Governor’s Residence, 1425 H Street, Lincoln. Open to the public, and in its second year, this holiday tradition will feature the Blackhawk Brass of the Nebraska National Guard 43rd Army Band, choir performers, Mr. &amp; Mrs. Claus, a live nativity scene, elf car rides, hayrack and horse drawn carriage rides, live animals, face painting, a balloon artist, hot cocoa, cookies and much more. The festivities will get underway at 2:30 p.m. and continue until 4:30 p.m. Streets around the Governor’s Residence will be closed to traffic during that time. As all events will take place outside, attendees are encouraged to dress appropriately for the weather.Throughout the holiday season, visitors are welcome to the State Capitol. Free guided tours are offered hourly Monday – Friday at the following times: 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 1:00 2:00, 3:00 and 4:00. On Saturdays, tours begin at 10 a.m. and on Sundays at 1:00 p.m. The Capitol will be closed on Christmas Day (Dec. 25) and again on New Year’s Day (Jan. 1). Once lit, the tree will remain up through Sunday, Dec. 29.Please call the Tour Office at (402) 471-0448 for more information about visiting the Capitol.<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/12/1733154159178.jpeg" alt=" " />
 <figcaption> </figcaption>
 </figure>

 Capitol Tree Lighting & Hometown Christmas Details Released

LINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen is previewing some of his priorities for the 2025 legislative session. These initiatives, and others, align with his administration’s ongoing commitment to kids, taxes, agriculture and values.   

“This is by no means an all-encompassing list, but these items are certainly top of mind as we reflect on our past achievements and acknowledge there is still much to be accomplished,” said Gov. Pillen. “We must continue to build on those foundations, addressing issues that are of greatest concern to Nebraskans.”  

KIDS:   Gov. Pillen is advocating for guidelines around athletic activities, aimed at protecting both kids and women.  Legislation brought by Senator Kathleen Kauth in 2023 proposed guidelines for opposite-sex participation in sports activities and the use of restroom and locker room facilities. It was carried over into 2024 but failed to advance by only two votes. 

Eight months into his administration, Gov. Pillen became the second governor to issue an executive order establishing a Women’s Bill of Rights, which in part, defined terms like “male” and “female” as guidance to agencies, boards and commissions. That order remains in effect, only to expire upon passage of a state law that provides the necessary clarification to these issues.

TAXES:  Legislation passed during the summer special session produced $185 million in new tax relief, and established caps on local tax collections. Recently, Gov. Pillen issued the 2024 School Property Tax Collection Report, which makes the case for reworking the Tax Equity and Equalization Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA) formula, so that it provides schools a more stable and consistent method of budgeting; thereby, reducing the amount of increase that schools feel they need to offset reductions in state aid.

“We cannot continue down the path of Nebraskan’s paying among the highest property taxes in the nation,” said Gov. Pillen. “It makes us less competitive with other states and less attractive to people who may be looking to move here. This is a situation that we will keep fighting to address.”

AGRICULTURE:   New legislation will be introduced aimed at banning the sale of lab-grown meat. This follows Gov. Pillen’s executive order prohibiting the state from purchasing products defined as lab-grown meat and prohibiting other parties from contracting with the state, which might also procure lab-grown meat.

At a news conference in August, Gov. Pillen pointed to the uncertainty of health impacts arising from consumption of lab-grown meat and that other states and countries have implemented strict labeling requirements and outright bans to best protect consumers. The Nebraska Department of Agriculture (NDA) has drafted rules and regulations to ensure proper labeling and make certain that lab meat is not sold on store shelves next to natural meat products.

At the media event, Gov. Pillen reinforced his commitment to Nebraska farmers and ranchers, who produce products that drive Nebraska’s economy and are highly sought overseas.  “We feed the world and we save the planet more effectively and more efficiently than anybody else and I will defend those practices with my last breath.”

VALUES:  Returning the state’s allocation of electoral votes to winner-take-all is another top priority when the 109th Legislature convenes. Since 1993, Nebraska, has apportioned its electoral college votes in a way that promotes gerrymandering and prioritizes a small minority of voters over a majority of the public. For example, in the 2024 presidential election, 8% of Nebraskans allocated 20% of the electoral college votes. Gov. Pillen seeks to change this unjust system and have Nebraska rejoin the 48 other states that allocate electoral college votes through winner-take-all.

Office of Governor Jim PillenLINCOLN, NE – Governor Jim Pillen is previewing some of his priorities for the 2025 legislative session. These initiatives, and others, align with his administration’s ongoing commitment to kids, taxes, agriculture and values. “This is by no means an all-encompassing list, but these items are certainly top of mind as we reflect on our past achievements and acknowledge there is still much to be accomplished,” said Gov. Pillen. “We must continue to build on those foundations, addressing issues that are of greatest concern to Nebraskans.” KIDS: Gov. Pillen is advocating for guidelines around athletic activities, aimed at protecting both kids and women. Legislation brought by Senator Kathleen Kauth in 2023 proposed guidelines for opposite-sex participation in sports activities and the use of restroom and locker room facilities. It was carried over into 2024 but failed to advance by only two votes. Eight months into his administration, Gov. Pillen became the second governor to issue an executive order establishing a Women’s Bill of Rights, which in part, defined terms like “male” and “female” as guidance to agencies, boards and commissions. That order remains in effect, only to expire upon passage of a state law that provides the necessary clarification to these issues.TAXES: Legislation passed during the summer special session produced $185 million in new tax relief, and established caps on local tax collections. Recently, Gov. Pillen issued the 2024 School Property Tax Collection Report, which makes the case for reworking the Tax Equity and Equalization Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA) formula, so that it provides schools a more stable and consistent method of budgeting; thereby, reducing the amount of increase that schools feel they need to offset reductions in state aid.“We cannot continue down the path of Nebraskan’s paying among the highest property taxes in the nation,” said Gov. Pillen. “It makes us less competitive with other states and less attractive to people who may be looking to move here. This is a situation that we will keep fighting to address.”AGRICULTURE: New legislation will be introduced aimed at banning the sale of lab-grown meat. This follows Gov. Pillen’s executive order prohibiting the state from purchasing products defined as lab-grown meat and prohibiting other parties from contracting with the state, which might also procure lab-grown meat.At a news conference in August, Gov. Pillen pointed to the uncertainty of health impacts arising from consumption of lab-grown meat and that other states and countries have implemented strict labeling requirements and outright bans to best protect consumers. The Nebraska Department of Agriculture (NDA) has drafted rules and regulations to ensure proper labeling and make certain that lab meat is not sold on store shelves next to natural meat products.At the media event, Gov. Pillen reinforced his commitment to Nebraska farmers and ranchers, who produce products that drive Nebraska’s economy and are highly sought overseas. “We feed the world and we save the planet more effectively and more efficiently than anybody else and I will defend those practices with my last breath.”VALUES: Returning the state’s allocation of electoral votes to winner-take-all is another top priority when the 109th Legislature convenes. Since 1993, Nebraska, has apportioned its electoral college votes in a way that promotes gerrymandering and prioritizes a small minority of voters over a majority of the public. For example, in the 2024 presidential election, 8% of Nebraskans allocated 20% of the electoral college votes. Gov. Pillen seeks to change this unjust system and have Nebraska rejoin the 48 other states that allocate electoral college votes through winner-take-all.

Gov. Pillen Previews 2025 Legislative Priorities

JERUSALEM- U.S. Navy destroyers USS Stockdale (DDG 106) and the USS O’Kane (DDG 77) successfully defeated a range of Iranian-backed Houthi rebel-launched weapons while transiting the Gulf of Aden on Saturday on Sunday, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command.

The destroyers were escorting three U.S. owned, operated, flagged merchant vessels and the reckless attacks resulted in no injuries and no damage to any vessels, civilian or U.S. Naval.

The destroyers successfully engaged and defeated three anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), three one-way attack uncrewed aerial systems (OWA UAS), and one anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM), ensuring the safety of the ships and their personnel, as well as civilian vessels and their crews.

These actions reflect the ongoing commitment of CENTCOM forces to protect U.S. personnel, regional partners, and international shipping, against attacks by Iran-backed Houthis.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/12/1703990687604.png" alt="File photo U.S. Central Command" />
 <figcaption>File photo U.S. Central Command</figcaption>
 </figure>JERUSALEM- U.S. Navy destroyers USS Stockdale (DDG 106) and the USS O’Kane (DDG 77) successfully defeated a range of Iranian-backed Houthi rebel-launched weapons while transiting the Gulf of Aden on Saturday on Sunday, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command.The destroyers were escorting three U.S. owned, operated, flagged merchant vessels and the reckless attacks resulted in no injuries and no damage to any vessels, civilian or U.S. Naval.The destroyers successfully engaged and defeated three anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), three one-way attack uncrewed aerial systems (OWA UAS), and one anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM), ensuring the safety of the ships and their personnel, as well as civilian vessels and their crews.These actions reflect the ongoing commitment of CENTCOM forces to protect U.S. personnel, regional partners, and international shipping, against attacks by Iran-backed Houthis.

 U.S. forces defeat attack on U.S. Navy and U.S.-flagged ships in Gulf of Aden

President&nbsp;Joe Biden&nbsp;pardoned his son,&nbsp;Hunter, on Sunday, despite a pledge not to do so. The action will allow the younger Biden to avoid possible time in prison.

Below is the full statement on the pardon released by the White House

Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted.&nbsp;Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions.&nbsp;It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.&nbsp;

&nbsp;The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election. Then, a carefully negotiated plea deal, agreed to by the Department of Justice, unraveled in the court room – with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process.&nbsp;Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter’s cases.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;

No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution.&nbsp;In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me – and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough.&nbsp;&nbsp;

For my entire career I have followed a simple principle: just tell the American people the truth. They’ll be fair-minded.&nbsp;Here’s the truth: I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice – and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I&nbsp;hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Executive Grant of ClemencyJoseph R. Biden, Jr.President of the United States of America&nbsp;

To All to Whom These Presents Shall Come, Greeting:&nbsp;

Be It Known, That This Day, I, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Pursuant to My Powers Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution, Have Granted Unto&nbsp;

A Full and Unconditional Pardon&nbsp;For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted (including any that have resulted in convictions) by Special Counsel David C. Weiss in Docket No. 1:23-cr-00061-MN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and Docket No. 2:23-CR-00599-MCS-1 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.&nbsp;

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name and caused the Pardon to be recorded with the Department of Justice.&nbsp;

Done at the City of Washington this 1st day of December in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-four and of the Independence of the United States the Two Hundred and Forty-ninth.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2023/12/1702480298924.png" alt="File photo Hunter Biden courtesy CSPAN" />
 <figcaption>File photo Hunter Biden courtesy CSPAN</figcaption>
 </figure>President&nbsp;Joe Biden&nbsp;pardoned his son,&nbsp;Hunter, on Sunday, despite a pledge not to do so. The action will allow the younger Biden to avoid possible time in prison.Below is the full statement on the pardon released by the White House--------Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted.&nbsp;Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions.&nbsp;It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.&nbsp;&nbsp;The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election. Then, a carefully negotiated plea deal, agreed to by the Department of Justice, unraveled in the court room – with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process.&nbsp;Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter’s cases.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son – and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution.&nbsp;In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me – and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough.&nbsp;&nbsp;For my entire career I have followed a simple principle: just tell the American people the truth. They’ll be fair-minded.&nbsp;Here’s the truth: I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice – and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I&nbsp;hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.&nbsp;&nbsp;###&nbsp;Executive Grant of ClemencyJoseph R. Biden, Jr.President of the United States of America&nbsp;To All to Whom These Presents Shall Come, Greeting:&nbsp;Be It Known, That This Day, I, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Pursuant to My Powers Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution, Have Granted Unto&nbsp;ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN&nbsp;A Full and Unconditional Pardon&nbsp;For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted (including any that have resulted in convictions) by Special Counsel David C. Weiss in Docket No. 1:23-cr-00061-MN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and Docket No. 2:23-CR-00599-MCS-1 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.&nbsp;IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name and caused the Pardon to be recorded with the Department of Justice.&nbsp;Done at the City of Washington this 1st day of December in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-four and of the Independence of the United States the Two Hundred and Forty-ninth.-------

Biden pardons son Hunter on gun, tax convictions despite pledge not to

BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/timhenderson/">TIM HENDERSON</a>

The U.S. Census Bureau and a growing number of states are starting to gather more detailed information about Americans’ race and ethnicity, a change some advocates of the process say will allow people to choose identities that more closely reflect how they see themselves.

Crunching and sorting through those specific details — known as data disaggregation — will help illuminate disparities in areas such as housing and health outcomes that could be hidden within large racial and ethnic categories. But some experts say the details also might make it harder for Black people from multiracial countries to identify themselves.

Racial data gleaned from the census is important because local, state, tribal and federal governments&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/race/#:~:text=Local%2C%20state%2C%20tribal%2C%20and,or%20services%20for%20specific%20groups." target="_blank">use it to guide</a>&nbsp;certain civil rights policies and&nbsp;“in planning and funding government programs that provide funds or services for specific groups,” according to the Census Bureau.

The form will have checkboxes for main categories — current census groupings include “Asian,” “Black,” “African American” and “White,” among others&nbsp;— followed by more specific checkboxes. Under Asian, for example, might be Chinese, Asian Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean or Japanese. And then there will be an empty box for people to write in more specific subgroups.

Collecting more detail by allowing free-form answers, for example, will make it possible for people to identify themselves as part of more racial and ethnic subgroups — such as “Sardinian” (an autonomous region within Italy) instead of simply “Italian” — and include alternative names for certain groups, such as writing “Schitsu’umsh,” the ancient language for “Coeur D’Alene Tribe.”

And the Census Bureau will for the first time include Middle Eastern/North African as a separate racial/ethnic category for respondents with that heritage. Until now, Middle Eastern people who did not choose a race were treated as a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-mena-population.html" target="_blank">subcategory</a>&nbsp;under “white,” based on a 1944 court&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lwv.org/blog/representing-middle-eastern-and-north-african-citizens-census#:~:text=It%20would%20not%20be%20until%20a%20district,Walter%2DMcCarran%20Act%20nullified%20all%20previous%20Asian%2Dexclusion%20laws." target="_blank">ruling</a>&nbsp;intended to protect Arab immigrants from racist laws banning U.S. citizenship for nonwhite immigrants.

Under&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/29/2024-06469/revisions-to-ombs-statistical-policy-directive-no-15-standards-for-maintaining-collecting-and" target="_blank">new federal guidelines</a>&nbsp;approved in March, the bureau also will give people the option to check no race at all if they identify as Hispanic or Middle Eastern/North African.

The Census Bureau already has decided to use more open-ended questions in both the 2027 American Community Survey and the nation’s 2030 census. But the agency is seeking&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/11/18/2024-26827/the-census-bureaus-proposed-raceethnicity-code-list-for-the-american-community-survey-and-the-2030?utm_source=censusSDC&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">public comment</a>&nbsp;on the way write-in responses will be categorized.

The bureau wants to hear how people are likely to identify themselves, said Merarys Ríos-Vargas, chief of the bureau’s Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, Population Division, in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024/webinar-race-ethnicity-coding-improvement.html" target="_blank">recent webinar</a>. The agency also is interested in whether there are missing or incorrect entries in its proposed list of possible responses.

Nancy López, a University of New Mexico sociology professor, said she and other experts in Black Hispanic culture think the census should have a “visual race” or “street race” question, so people can communicate how others see them as well as how they identify themselves. The answer might be “Black” or a yet-unrecognized racial category such as “brown.”

“A separate question on race as a visual status helps illuminate the kind of things we are interested in — discrimination in housing, discrimination in employment, discrimination in education and accessing health care in public spaces,” said López, who is the daughter of Dominican immigrants and a co-founder of the university’s Institute for the Study of “Race” &amp; Social Justice.

“It’s about people’s lives, it’s about the future, it’s about children, it’s about access to opportunities and it’s about fairness,” she added, noting that even if the federal government doesn’t add such questions to surveys and the decennial census, state and universities can still do it on their own as they collect data for health care, student enrollment and other topics.

The NALEO Educational Fund, an organization representing Latino elected and appointed officials, supports the decision to make a race choice optional for Hispanics.

“Many Latinos did not see themselves in any of the categories for their racial identity,” said Rosalind Gold, NALEO’s chief public policy officer. “There’s a large number of Latinos who feel that identifying as Latino is both their racial and ethnic identity.”

Gold said NALEO understands the concern some have that failing to require a race designation will obscure racial information on Black Hispanics. But her group argues that the census can get what it needs by educating the public on how to respond and by including prompts on the questionnaires to guide race choices.

Black Hispanic people often see themselves as having a single racial and ethnic identity, according to several experts in Hispanic identity who spoke at a Census Bureau National Advisory Committee meeting Nov. 7.

“They conceptualize themselves as belonging to one [group],” said Nicholas Vargas, an associate professor of ethnic studies at the University of California, Berkeley, speaking at the committee meeting.

“They check ‘Black’ and they check ‘Dominican’ — and don’t want to be counted as two or more,” he said.

In response, Rachel Marks, an adviser for the Census Bureau on race and ethnicity, said the bureau will consider that issue and other “feedback on how people want to be represented” before making a final decision on survey details.

The bureau may recognize a term, Afro-Latino, that could be used to indicate both Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, according to a proposed code list from the agency, as well as “Blaxican” for Black Mexican and “Blasian“ for Black Asian.

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of civil rights groups, called the more detailed questions&nbsp;<a href="https://www2.census.gov/about/partners/cac/nac/meetings/2024-11/public-comment-leadership-conference-civil-rights.pdf" target="_blank">“a step forward”</a>&nbsp;but also suggested more guidance on the forms to ensure people are categorized the way they want to be. In its comment on the changes, the group noted that in 2020, some people who wrote in “British” under the Black checkbox were categorized as partly white even if they didn’t mean that.

The group&nbsp;<a href="https://civilrights.org/resource/leadership-conference-comments-on-timeline-for-updated-race-and-ethnicity-standards-implementation-on-the-acs/" target="_blank">also said</a>&nbsp;it is “concerned about a conflation of the concepts of race and ethnicity,” and it asked for more research to make sure people understand how to respond.

Some states are acting on their own to gather more detailed data about identity.

New Jersey is among the latest states to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nj.gov/governor/news/news/562024/20240112g.shtml" target="_blank">pass a law</a>&nbsp;requiring more detailed race and ethnic data collection for state records such as health data and school enrollment.

A similar&nbsp;<a href="https://legislature.mi.gov/Bills/Bill?ObjectName=2024-HB-5447" target="_blank">bill</a>&nbsp;in Michigan would require state agencies that gather information to offer “multiracial” and “Middle Eastern or North African” as choices; the bill remains in committee.

And advocates in Oregon, which already&nbsp;<a href="https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/viewSingleRule.action?ruleVrsnRsn=315084" target="_blank">has a law</a>&nbsp;requiring detailed ethnic data collection, are&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/education/2024/10/asian-american-students-advocates-call-for-the-state-to-collect-more-detailed-data-about-their-ethnicities.html" target="_blank">asking the state</a>&nbsp;for more details on Asian subgroups who face education challenges.

A&nbsp;<a href="https://civilrights.org/edfund/resource/disaggregation-nation-a-landscape-review-of-state-race-ethnicity-data-collection/" target="_blank">December 2023 report</a>&nbsp;by The Leadership Conference Education Fund identified 13 other states with laws requiring more detailed state data on ethnic and racial groups, including laws passed last year in Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts and Nevada.

The states of California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington already had such laws, the group found.

<a href="https://stateline.org/" target="_blank">Stateline</a>&nbsp;is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:info@stateline.org">info@stateline.org</a>. Follow Stateline on&nbsp;<a href="https://facebook.com/statelinenewsroom" target="_blank">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/stateline_news" target="_blank">X</a>.

<figure>
 <img src="https://media.eaglewebservices.com/public/2024/11/1732917563275.png" alt="" />
 <figcaption></figcaption>
 </figure>BY:&nbsp;<a href="https://missouriindependent.com/author/timhenderson/">TIM HENDERSON</a>The U.S. Census Bureau and a growing number of states are starting to gather more detailed information about Americans’ race and ethnicity, a change some advocates of the process say will allow people to choose identities that more closely reflect how they see themselves.Crunching and sorting through those specific details — known as data disaggregation — will help illuminate disparities in areas such as housing and health outcomes that could be hidden within large racial and ethnic categories. But some experts say the details also might make it harder for Black people from multiracial countries to identify themselves.Racial data gleaned from the census is important because local, state, tribal and federal governments&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/race/#:~:text=Local%2C%20state%2C%20tribal%2C%20and,or%20services%20for%20specific%20groups." target="_blank">use it to guide</a>&nbsp;certain civil rights policies and&nbsp;“in planning and funding government programs that provide funds or services for specific groups,” according to the Census Bureau.The form will have checkboxes for main categories — current census groupings include “Asian,” “Black,” “African American” and “White,” among others&nbsp;— followed by more specific checkboxes. Under Asian, for example, might be Chinese, Asian Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean or Japanese. And then there will be an empty box for people to write in more specific subgroups.Collecting more detail by allowing free-form answers, for example, will make it possible for people to identify themselves as part of more racial and ethnic subgroups — such as “Sardinian” (an autonomous region within Italy) instead of simply “Italian” — and include alternative names for certain groups, such as writing “Schitsu’umsh,” the ancient language for “Coeur D’Alene Tribe.”And the Census Bureau will for the first time include Middle Eastern/North African as a separate racial/ethnic category for respondents with that heritage. Until now, Middle Eastern people who did not choose a race were treated as a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/2020-census-dhc-a-mena-population.html" target="_blank">subcategory</a>&nbsp;under “white,” based on a 1944 court&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lwv.org/blog/representing-middle-eastern-and-north-african-citizens-census#:~:text=It%20would%20not%20be%20until%20a%20district,Walter%2DMcCarran%20Act%20nullified%20all%20previous%20Asian%2Dexclusion%20laws." target="_blank">ruling</a>&nbsp;intended to protect Arab immigrants from racist laws banning U.S. citizenship for nonwhite immigrants.Under&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/29/2024-06469/revisions-to-ombs-statistical-policy-directive-no-15-standards-for-maintaining-collecting-and" target="_blank">new federal guidelines</a>&nbsp;approved in March, the bureau also will give people the option to check no race at all if they identify as Hispanic or Middle Eastern/North African.The Census Bureau already has decided to use more open-ended questions in both the 2027 American Community Survey and the nation’s 2030 census. But the agency is seeking&nbsp;<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/11/18/2024-26827/the-census-bureaus-proposed-raceethnicity-code-list-for-the-american-community-survey-and-the-2030?utm_source=censusSDC&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">public comment</a>&nbsp;on the way write-in responses will be categorized.The bureau wants to hear how people are likely to identify themselves, said Merarys Ríos-Vargas, chief of the bureau’s Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, Population Division, in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024/webinar-race-ethnicity-coding-improvement.html" target="_blank">recent webinar</a>. The agency also is interested in whether there are missing or incorrect entries in its proposed list of possible responses.<h2>‘It’s about people’s lives’</h2>Nancy López, a University of New Mexico sociology professor, said she and other experts in Black Hispanic culture think the census should have a “visual race” or “street race” question, so people can communicate how others see them as well as how they identify themselves. The answer might be “Black” or a yet-unrecognized racial category such as “brown.”“A separate question on race as a visual status helps illuminate the kind of things we are interested in — discrimination in housing, discrimination in employment, discrimination in education and accessing health care in public spaces,” said López, who is the daughter of Dominican immigrants and a co-founder of the university’s Institute for the Study of “Race” &amp; Social Justice.“It’s about people’s lives, it’s about the future, it’s about children, it’s about access to opportunities and it’s about fairness,” she added, noting that even if the federal government doesn’t add such questions to surveys and the decennial census, state and universities can still do it on their own as they collect data for health care, student enrollment and other topics.The NALEO Educational Fund, an organization representing Latino elected and appointed officials, supports the decision to make a race choice optional for Hispanics.“Many Latinos did not see themselves in any of the categories for their racial identity,” said Rosalind Gold, NALEO’s chief public policy officer. “There’s a large number of Latinos who feel that identifying as Latino is both their racial and ethnic identity.”Gold said NALEO understands the concern some have that failing to require a race designation will obscure racial information on Black Hispanics. But her group argues that the census can get what it needs by educating the public on how to respond and by including prompts on the questionnaires to guide race choices.Black Hispanic people often see themselves as having a single racial and ethnic identity, according to several experts in Hispanic identity who spoke at a Census Bureau National Advisory Committee meeting Nov. 7.“They conceptualize themselves as belonging to one [group],” said Nicholas Vargas, an associate professor of ethnic studies at the University of California, Berkeley, speaking at the committee meeting.“They check ‘Black’ and they check ‘Dominican’ — and don’t want to be counted as two or more,” he said.In response, Rachel Marks, an adviser for the Census Bureau on race and ethnicity, said the bureau will consider that issue and other “feedback on how people want to be represented” before making a final decision on survey details.The bureau may recognize a term, Afro-Latino, that could be used to indicate both Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, according to a proposed code list from the agency, as well as “Blaxican” for Black Mexican and “Blasian“ for Black Asian.The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of civil rights groups, called the more detailed questions&nbsp;<a href="https://www2.census.gov/about/partners/cac/nac/meetings/2024-11/public-comment-leadership-conference-civil-rights.pdf" target="_blank">“a step forward”</a>&nbsp;but also suggested more guidance on the forms to ensure people are categorized the way they want to be. In its comment on the changes, the group noted that in 2020, some people who wrote in “British” under the Black checkbox were categorized as partly white even if they didn’t mean that.The group&nbsp;<a href="https://civilrights.org/resource/leadership-conference-comments-on-timeline-for-updated-race-and-ethnicity-standards-implementation-on-the-acs/" target="_blank">also said</a>&nbsp;it is “concerned about a conflation of the concepts of race and ethnicity,” and it asked for more research to make sure people understand how to respond.<h2>State actions</h2>Some states are acting on their own to gather more detailed data about identity.New Jersey is among the latest states to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nj.gov/governor/news/news/562024/20240112g.shtml" target="_blank">pass a law</a>&nbsp;requiring more detailed race and ethnic data collection for state records such as health data and school enrollment.A similar&nbsp;<a href="https://legislature.mi.gov/Bills/Bill?ObjectName=2024-HB-5447" target="_blank">bill</a>&nbsp;in Michigan would require state agencies that gather information to offer “multiracial” and “Middle Eastern or North African” as choices; the bill remains in committee.And advocates in Oregon, which already&nbsp;<a href="https://secure.sos.state.or.us/oard/viewSingleRule.action?ruleVrsnRsn=315084" target="_blank">has a law</a>&nbsp;requiring detailed ethnic data collection, are&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oregonlive.com/education/2024/10/asian-american-students-advocates-call-for-the-state-to-collect-more-detailed-data-about-their-ethnicities.html" target="_blank">asking the state</a>&nbsp;for more details on Asian subgroups who face education challenges.A&nbsp;<a href="https://civilrights.org/edfund/resource/disaggregation-nation-a-landscape-review-of-state-race-ethnicity-data-collection/" target="_blank">December 2023 report</a>&nbsp;by The Leadership Conference Education Fund identified 13 other states with laws requiring more detailed state data on ethnic and racial groups, including laws passed last year in Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts and Nevada.The states of California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington already had such laws, the group found.<a href="https://stateline.org/" target="_blank">Stateline</a>&nbsp;is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:info@stateline.org">info@stateline.org</a>. Follow Stateline on&nbsp;<a href="https://facebook.com/statelinenewsroom" target="_blank">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/stateline_news" target="_blank">X</a>.

The next census will gather more racial, ethnic information

WASHINGTON&nbsp;– U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) this week introduced the “Returning Education to Our States Act” which would eliminate the U.S. Department of Education and redistribute all critical federal programs under other departments, according to a statement from his office.

Click&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rounds.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/returning_education_to_our_states_act.pdf">HERE</a>&nbsp;to read the full bill text

The Department was created in 1979 with the goal of collecting data and advising schools across the U.S. on best practices. In the 45 years since then, it has grown into an oversized bureaucracy with a budget that’s 449% larger than it was at its founding. Despite the Department spending $16,000 per student per year, standardized test scores have been dropping over the past ten years, further displaying the Department’s ineffectiveness on the quality of education for American students. Any grants or funding from the Department are only given to states and educational institutions in exchange for adopting the one-size-fits-all standards put forth by the Department.

“The federal Department of Education has never educated a single student, and it’s long past time to end this bureaucratic Department that causes more harm than good,” said Rounds. “We all know local control is best when it comes to education. Everyone raised in South Dakota can think of a teacher who played a big part in their educational journey. Local school boards and state Departments of Education know best what their students need, not unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.

“For years, I’ve worked toward removing the federal Department of Education. I’m pleased that President-elect Trump shares this vision, and I’m excited to work with him and Republican majorities in the Senate and House to make this a reality. This legislation is a roadmap to eliminating the federal Department of Education by practically rehoming these federal programs in the departments where they belong, which will be critical as we move into next year.”

Despite its inefficiencies, there are several important programs housed within the Department. Rounds’ legislation would redirect these to Departments of Interior, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Labor and State:

WASHINGTON&nbsp;– U.S. Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) this week introduced the “Returning Education to Our States Act” which would eliminate the U.S. Department of Education and redistribute all critical federal programs under other departments, according to a statement from his office.Click&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rounds.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/returning_education_to_our_states_act.pdf">HERE</a>&nbsp;to read the full bill textThe Department was created in 1979 with the goal of collecting data and advising schools across the U.S. on best practices. In the 45 years since then, it has grown into an oversized bureaucracy with a budget that’s 449% larger than it was at its founding. Despite the Department spending $16,000 per student per year, standardized test scores have been dropping over the past ten years, further displaying the Department’s ineffectiveness on the quality of education for American students. Any grants or funding from the Department are only given to states and educational institutions in exchange for adopting the one-size-fits-all standards put forth by the Department.“The federal Department of Education has never educated a single student, and it’s long past time to end this bureaucratic Department that causes more harm than good,” said Rounds. “We all know local control is best when it comes to education. Everyone raised in South Dakota can think of a teacher who played a big part in their educational journey. Local school boards and state Departments of Education know best what their students need, not unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.“For years, I’ve worked toward removing the federal Department of Education. I’m pleased that President-elect Trump shares this vision, and I’m excited to work with him and Republican majorities in the Senate and House to make this a reality. This legislation is a roadmap to eliminating the federal Department of Education by practically rehoming these federal programs in the departments where they belong, which will be critical as we move into next year.”Despite its inefficiencies, there are several important programs housed within the Department. Rounds’ legislation would redirect these to Departments of Interior, Treasury, Health and Human Services, Labor and State:Department of the Interior<ul>
 <li>Native American-Serving Institutions Programs</li><li>Alaska Native Education Equity Program</li><li>American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program</li><li>Indian Education Formula Grants and National Activities</li><li>Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program</li><li>Native Hawaiian Education</li><li>Special Programs for Indian Children</li><li>Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Education Program</li><li>Impact Aid Programs</li>
 </ul>Department of the Treasury<ul>
 <li>William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program</li><li>Federal Family Education Loan Program</li><li>Federal Perkins Loan Program</li><li>Federal Pell Grant Program</li><li>Health Education Assistance Loan Program</li><li>Education Sciences Reform Act</li>
 </ul>Department of Health and Human Services<ul>
 <li>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</li><li>American Printing House for the Blind</li><li>Helen Keller Center for Deaf/Blind Youth and Adults</li><li>Federal Real Property Assistance Program</li><li>Special Education Grants</li>
 </ul>Department of Labor<ul>
 <li>All Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education programs</li><li>National Technical Institute for the Deaf</li><li>Randolph Sheppard Vending Facility Program</li><li>Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants</li>
 </ul>Department of State<ul>
 <li>Fulbright-Hays Program</li>
 </ul>=